Dear Knock'em Sock'em robots...

Fine, if everything you're saying has merit, then why aren't all existing policital designs on a least 25 year forward-looking sustainable horizons?

You have global empire of military bases that are now about to...

Run out of fuel.  Luckily I have designed to turn all global military 20th century logic war machines into steampunk like church cores, but more importantly, the condition of America is (in general, not in specific exception) stupid, fat, off-balance, in-debt, and going in the wrong direction to correct that, and I know 2012 is coming and the world is gonna end anyway or whatever, but there are so many ways the world could be designed better if the real, true, common global resource problems facing the world were just directly addressed and designed around my any means necessary, but when what is is being formed and used as man vs. man wasteful weaponry instead of a common "hey we're all the same general type of animal" Utopian infrastructure and synced programming design, why, when none of the existing global designs even make it past a 50 year sustainable horizon, and technological evolution is making millions if not billions of traditional human job roles obsolete, how can the growth economy-based model still be entertained and pushed as an acceptable model?

It's the same old business as usual, like me sitting here with only $300 left and addicited to remotely policing the school board with my eye for creativity and innovative solutions instead of just getting any one of those random photos reproduced and getting a commercial agent and/or token role on set of one sort or another to restart the jets, but one is the core of existence that affects billions of myopic and very questionably programmed herd animals, and the other is just little old MacGyver me who has apparently become far more used to survivng with nothing than most.

Sure, if push every comes to shove entire societies could be saved and mobilized with the lessons being learned and illustrated, all requiring little more than that low-energy entertainment/enhanced education based matrix-like hiberation model I proposed as a solution to 3 world developing countries when this began being publically broadcast in 2006, and God knows I know habit, conditioning, and group influence can be everything if not far-too-powerful to always be helpful when left unchecked, but when these kids are dealing with the kind of numbers and implications they are, how can they be talking about "just shutting down the government" like that is a solution?

Don't shut down the government, fix the government.  And don't fix the government trying to see and approach things in the same way that broke it, team up with Google and non-nationalist or truly bought minds in power in all hiearchies around the globe and try to devise and design new transitional systems to reprogram the world...because unsustainable = death, and death = the opposite point of the entire game of life.

Think from the future looking back at this, not from the past as a foundational reference or justification. Actors as leaders trickling down wet yellow liquid economics on your forehead and telling you it's raining in a really inexplicably warm and directed stream?

Well...