RT @Beers_n_Broads RT @ChelseaVPeretti: ONG!!! !! -Atheist <<< The simple brilliance of this tweet has caused me to weep sweet tears of joy. #gottaTissue /// See, I'm not the only crazy one talking in codes that some interestingly misinterpret in disappointing ways sometimes, others less so much,
#likeagiegercountercounting
#ohyesfullyawareofthebullsh7trhetoric
#whichiswhyfiniteresourcesarelegoedandcounted
#chartthatforme____ <---What did you fill in there? On what reference criteria? What gives you the comparitively statistical and behavioral dynamic right to consume yourself and behave like that and not be directly honest about everything you are and do or aren't and don't as a sentient being, and make we analyze the depth of your reference logic, and measure all asspects in all directions?
Starting with the design and philosophical mechanics of the perceptual atmosphere itself.
How many weak men does it take to destroy the solitary only true reproductive equation of a women? More than one at the same time? Now then, inversely, why does a singular patriach with a clear, transparent, mutually supportive and respectful 'cape' of the femine surrounding him so that it becomes a Perfectly-Interesting-Enough equation that the association between sex and the thoughts of the what it is tied to aren't taken so far in bastardizing the population before it even has a chance mindset that is responsible for all the other misfocuses and sideeffects the world has going on.
Goodness, it's just silly to step back and look at considering I went through it and understand the full 'normal' programming, but when the design of the entire world as a whole is plummeting in incomprehsibily stupid and keeping up with the wrong things directions, what would the kid say to you right now, even assuming whatever mindset you have but without the benefit of the remotely same resource rich debt putoff world you exist in acting like nothing matters, including friends and strangers, except as
I'm sorry, What?
No comments:
Post a Comment